Mobile Phone Use May Cause Cancer: WHO Experts
Marlowe Hood | June 01, 2011
The IARC said radio-frequency electromagnetic fields generated by such devices are "possibly carcinogenic" Related articles
Young Cancer Patients' 'Stronger' Video a Big Hit 10:22am May 14, 2012
Hugo Chavez Looks to God as Cancer Clouds Future 6:37pm May 8, 2012
Indonesian Health Minister to Resign From Post: SBY 3:58pm Apr 26, 2012
'Shave For Hope': Indonesians Go Bald to Fight Cancer 6:47pm Apr 22, 2012
US Woman Charged With Faking Cancer For Wedding 11:36am Apr 11, 2012
Mobile phone users may be at increased risk from brain cancer and should use texting and hands-free devices to reduce exposure, the World Health Organisation's cancer experts said.
Radio-frequency electromagnetic fields generated by such devices are "possibly carcinogenic to humans," the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) announced at the end of an eight-day meeting in Lyon, France, on Tuesday.
Experts "reached this classification based on review of the human evidence coming from epidemiological studies" pointing to an increased incidence of glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer, said Jonathan Samet, president of the work group.
Two studies in particular, the largest conducted over the past decade, showed a higher risk "in those that had the most intensive use of such phones," he said in a telephone news conference.
Some individuals tracked in the studies had used their phones for an average of 30 minutes per day over a period of 10 years.
"We simply don't know what might happen as people use their phones over longer time periods, possibly over a lifetime," Samet said.
There are about five billion mobile phones registered in the world. The number of phones and the average time spent using them have both climbed steadily in recent years.
The IARC cautioned that current scientific evidence showed only a possible link, not a proven one, between wireless devices and cancers.
"There is some evidence of increased risk of glioma" and another form of non-malignant tumour called acoustic neuroma, said Kurt Straif, the scientist in charge of editing the IARC reports on potentially carcinogenic agents.
"But it is not at the moment clearly established that the use of mobile phones does in fact cause cancer in humans," he said.
The IARC does not issue formal recommendations, but experts pointed to a number of ways consumers can reduce risk.
"What probably entails some of the highest exposure is using your mobile for voice calls," Straif said.
"If you use it for texting, or as a hands-free set for voice calls, this is clearly lowering the exposure by at least an order of magnitude," or by tenfold, he said.
The new review, conducted by a panel of 31 scientists from 14 countries, was reached on the basis of a "full consensus," said Robert Baan, in charge of the written report, which is yet to be released.
"This is the first scientific evaluation of all the literature published on the topic with regard to increased risk of cancer," he said.
But the panel stressed the need for more research, pointing to incomplete data, evolving technology and changing consumer habits.
"There's an improvement in the technology in terms of lower emissions but at the same time we see increased use, so it is hard to know how the two balance out," Baan noted.
One major international study under way, known as MOBI-KIDS, is investigating potential links between communication devices and brain cancer in children.
"Children are most vulnerable due to the intensity of emissions compared to the mass of tissue exposed," said Dominique Gombert, head of risk evaluation at France's Agency for Food, Environment and Occupational Health and Safety, but not part of the IARC panel.
"We need to redouble our efforts to reduce exposure," he told AFP.
The IARC ranks potentially cancer-causing elements as carcinogenic, probably carcinogenic, possibly carcinogenic or "probably not carcinogenic". It can also determine that a material is "not classifiable".
Cigarettes, sunbeds and asbestos, for example, fall in "Group 1", the top threat category.
Cell phones now join lead, chloroform and gasoline exhaust in Group 2B as "possibly carcinogenic".
AFP
- Hard-Line FPI Buys 150 Tickets to Stop Lady Gaga Concert
- Bali Offers to Host Lady Gaga Concert
- Indonesia's National Police Says it Might Allow Lady Gaga Show
- Police Chief to Be Summoned Over Lady Gaga and Church Dispute Controversies
- Lady Gaga No Longer Speechless, Talks About Jakarta Concert
- Lady Gaga Rocks Philippines, Defies Critics
- Jakarta Police Would Dispatch Up to 4,000 Officers for Lady Gaga Show
- Bali’s ‘Subak’ Technique Makes Unesco World Heritage List
- Insight: Indonesia Tycoon Bakrie Gears Up for Presidential Bid
- Forestry Ministry Says Greenpeace Claims vs APP Not True
-
8:54pm | Hard-Line FPI Buys 150 Tickets...
pik, great idea but real muslims wouldnt behave like the animals in the fpi. They might use the name of islam, but... -
8:46pm | First Lady Ani Says 'No Commen...
“Ani has a good chance of being nominated because she is popular among the people,” she said recently. I personally don't know 1 pe -
8:35pm | Indonesia Forest Moratorium Wo...
New study of ursine defecatory habits published. -
8:33pm | Australia’s Corby Gets Five-Ye...
Why do you think she is guilty on the flip side.... -
8:30pm | Former Army Chief Wiranto Proc...
Well seen KampungHighlander !! he will also be spending the ill gotten gain amassed during the fastuous period. This is the definition of IDIOT++ ( -
8:18pm | Hard-Line FPI Buys 150 Tickets...
Haha this is so funny. I bet they all will enjoy the concert when their inside. Gosh what a joke,the whole world ( well apart from arabic nation) i -
8:16pm | Hard-Line FPI Buys 150 Tickets...
@menado. I dont like your 2nd sentence. Why so degrading? 240 mil people and you sum it up so shamefully. -
8:14pm | Forestry Ministry Says Greenpe...
Yeah, I couldn't resist this one. It was only a matter of time before Greenpeace got their comeuppance for they way they reported that ramin story
