Welcome Guest   |  Login   |   Signup
JG Logo
Fri, February 10, 2012
Archive Search

N.Korea test-fires six ballistic missiles: S.Korea
by Park Chan-Kyong | July 04, 2009

North Korea fires rockets during a military exercise in January 2009 North Korea fires rockets during a military exercise in January 2009
Share This Page
0
0
0
0
Share with google+ :


North Korea test-fired six missiles off its east coast on Saturday, South Korean officials said, in what appeared to be a calculated message of defiance timed for the US Independence Day holiday.

The launches exacerbated regional tensions after the communist state's nuclear test in May, which coincided with the US Memorial Day holiday.

They came as Washington seeks support for tough enforcement of United Nations sanctions aimed at shutting down the North's nuclear and missile programmes.

Seoul's foreign ministry said the first four weapons launched into the Sea of Japan (East Sea) were ballistic missiles, which the North is banned from firing under various Security Council resolutions.

South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff said the fifth and sixth missiles were of the same type. The sixth was fired at 4:10 pm (07:10 GMT).

It was the first time in three years that the North had fired multiple ballistic missiles. It test-fired a long-range Taepodong-2 missile, along with several short and mid-range missiles, on US Independence Day in 2006.

The Joint Chiefs said they had a range of between 400 and 500 km (250-312 miles) but declined to say what type they were. Yonhap news agency said they were either Scuds, or Rodong-1 missiles whose maximum range of 1,300 km had been shortened.

The North on Thursday test-fired four short-range missiles with a range of 120 km into the Sea of Japan.

The latest launches, which started at 8am, were seen as more provocative since the missiles could potentially reach most of South Korea, and possibly parts of Japan.

"The military, on the basis of a strong joint defence alliance with the United States, is fully prepared to fend off any threats or provocations by the North," the Joint Chiefs said in a statement.

The foreign ministry said the missiles were fired from a site at Kitdaeryong near the eastern port of Wonsan.

It said the "provocative act... clearly violates" three UN Security Council resolutions, including the latest one on June 12 which toughened weapons-related sanctions on the North in response to its May 25 nuclear test.

In a statement the ministry expressed "deep regret over North Korea's continued acts to escalate tensions in Northeast Asia."

Professor Kim Yong-Hyun of Seoul's Dongguk University said the launches were clearly timed to coincide with US Independence Day.

"This is a thinly veiled warning to the United States and the international community that it may launch long-range missiles next time," he told AFP.

"The North is exercising salami tactics, firing short-range missiles on Thursday and launching missiles with longer range today."

Professor Yang Moo-Jin at Seoul's University of North Korean Studies said the North was trying to show it could defend its long-range missile launch site at Musudan-ri further to the north, and "testing the waters" following the UN resolution.

Japan condemned the launches.

"It is a serious act of provocation against the security of neighbouring countries, including our country," Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura said.

Kawamura warned Tokyo would "promptly take appropriate measures" to implement the resolution.

Baek Seung-Joo of the Korea Institute for Defence Analyses said the North test-fires missiles three to four times each year to improve technology and maintain missile exports.

"Today's launches were part of a usual military drill but by firing 500 km-range Scuds, the North was clearly displaying its ability to strike back against any international sanctions involving military means," Baek told AFP.

He said, however, that there is no sign of the North preparing to fire another long-range missile in the near future.

The North has made a series of bellicose moves this year. A long-range rocket launch on April 5 was followed by a nuclear test -- the second since 2006 -- on May 25.

In the days after its atomic test, Pyongyang fired a total of six short-range missiles, renounced the truce in force on the Korean peninsula for half a century and threatened possible attacks on Seoul.

When the United Nations in June tightened sanctions on its missile and atomic activities, the North vowed to build more nuclear bombs.

US and South Korean officials believe ailing leader Kim Jong-Il, 67, is staging a show of strength to bolster his authority as he tries to put in place a succession plan involving his youngest son, Kim Jong-Un.

AFP




  • 6:28pm | Opening Eyes to Tolerance Via ...
    agoz - methinks the lady doth protest too much. Suggest you watch 'The Kite Runner' - your type of film buddy.
  • 6:23pm | Indonesia Partners Catholic Ch...
    Church cleric abuse children for decades? It doesn't mean that Catholicism is bad right? Seriously. Or may be the side effect of c
  • 6:21pm | Concerned for Orangutans in In...
    waky - sorry, but what is your argument - that anything can be sacrificed to sustain human existance. If this is what you are saying I totally disa
  • 6:09pm | Shocking Images Show Animal Cr...
    I believe it's a bad deed of some persons which doesn't represent the whole society. The same case in Indonesia. Torturing animal is a sin .
  • 5:58pm | Indonesia President Gives Medi...
    Given the 'truth' 'Press Freedom in Indonesia is in reality some 83% less than it should be and has fallen significantly, 25% in just one year s
  • 5:46pm | Indonesian President’s New Pla...
    NOW LUCU ....Guy sitting on kerb of pavement ... He has a hammer in his hand and He is hitting his head hardly with the hammer ...Passer by asks wh
  • 5:43pm | Shocking Images Show Animal Cr...
    Indeed Dez, not a great answer. One of your few. It's just that there is no good answer to NRN's statements. I feel the same as him
  • 5:40pm | Malaysian Girl Speaks Indonesi...
    SBD: Ok thx for clearing that up. Not that nick matters at all, only useful to differentiate each individuals' views. All views appreciated.