Islamic Finance Faces Battle to Unify Industry
Kuala Lumpur. Islamic finance is toughening supervision of its powerful religious advisers as shareholders worldwide demand increasing accountability from directors, but key reforms may do little to boost transparency.
Competition for investor dollars and a growing market is putting pressure on the once-arcane industry to adopt clearer, more uniform guidelines.
Key to the challenges is the small number of scholars advising a growing number of banks on increasingly complex financing structures, raising issues such as transparency of rulings, independence of advisers and how to groom new scholars.
But varying Shariah standards, different regulatory approaches and vast disparities in development across markets stand in the way of reforms to streamline and boost supervision, which are critical to growth.
“Investors want to see the same degree of responsibility and professionalism going into Shariah compliance as they expect from Moody’s for credit ratings and S&P for market information,” said John Sandwick, a Geneva-based Islamic asset and wealth manager.
Shariah advisers control the reins of the $1 trillion industry through their rulings on whether financial products satisfy Islamic law.
Their role has been in focus following a recent attempt by Kuwait’s Investment Dar to challenge its Shariah board’s decision.
Bahrain-based industry body AAOIFI is drafting rules to regulate Shariah scholars’ shareholdings in banks and address concerns such as the number of Shariah supervisory boards on which a single scholar can effectively serve.
The International Shariah Research Academy for Islamic Finance, which is backed by Malaysia’s central bank, is planning a global regulatory body for Shariah advisers.
“This is a step too soon,” said Ayman H. A. Khaleq, a partner and Islamic banking lawyer at Vinson & Elkins in Dubai, referring to the proposed global authority.
“I don’t know how you’re going to convince all governments that this is the best approach. Without convincing governments, how are you going to give teeth to that association?”
Shariah scholars, typically experts in Islamic law and international banking practices, are now subject to differing levels of supervision across the jurisdictions but experts think this model cannot sustain the industry’s growth.
“Each industry player will come up with their own conflict avoidance and confidentiality provisions and you may find that some banks have higher standards than others, so we will see issues in the future if we’re not able to regulate well at this point,” said Rafe Haneef, HSBC Amanah’s managing director for global markets.
Reflecting the industry’s diversity, Middle Eastern countries like the United Arab Emirates leave regulation to the industry, whereas Malaysian authorities assume centralized control through national Shariah advisers and dedicated Islamic banking laws.
Practitioners agree on the need for more supervision but differ on the scope of oversight needed.
Some say regulating the issuance of fatwa would stifle ijtihad, or scholars’ reasoned judgment, and could stunt the growth of an industry which is still trying to come to terms with established conventional banking concepts like derivatives.
“You can standardize certain products that are a very cookie cutter, plain vanilla type,” said Jawad I. Ali, global deputy head of lawyers King & Spalding’s Islamic finance group.
“But there are a number of other products that haven’t been developed yet [in Islamic finance] and you cannot standardize something that hasn’t been developed.”