•    HOME   
•    NEWS   
•    BUSINESS   
•    INTERNATIONAL   
•    TECH   
•    SPORTS   
•    LIFE & TIMES   
•    OPINION   
•    MY JAKARTA   
•    BLOGS   
•    EYEWITNESS   

Washington. For months, companies have been sitting on the sidelines with record piles of cash, too nervous to spend. Now they’re starting to deploy some of that money — not to hire workers or build factories, but to prop up their share prices.

Sitting on these unprecedented levels of cash, US companies are buying back their own stock in droves.

So far this year, firms have announced they will purchase $273 billion of their own shares, more than five times that recorded this time last year, according to Birinyi Associates, a stock market research firm.

But the rise in buybacks signals that many companies are still hesitant to spend their cash on the job-generating activities that could produce growth.

Some companies are buying back shares partly because they don’t want to invest in developing new products or services while consumer demand remains weak.

“They don’t know what they want to do with all the cash they’re sitting on,” said Zachary Karabell, president of River Twice Research.

Historically low interest rates are also prompting some companies to borrow to repurchase shares.

Microsoft, for instance, borrowed $4.75 billion last month by issuing bonds at rock-bottom interest rates and announced it would use some of that money to buy back shares.

The company already has nearly $37 billion in cash, but much of that money is being held by its operations overseas.

The tech company is reluctant to repatriate the money because it would get hit with a huge corporate tax bill.

A share buyback is a quick way to make a stock more attractive to Wall Street.

It improves a closely watched metric known as earnings per share, which divides a company’s profit by the total number of shares on the market.

Such a move can produce a sudden burst of interest in a stock, improving its price.

Among the biggest buybacks so far this year: Hewlett-Packard, the world’s biggest maker of personal computers, said in August it would spend $10 billion buying its shares.

Its stock rose 1.5 percent after the announcement.

In March, giant snack-food maker PepsiCo announced it would raise its dividend and buy back as much as $15 billion in common stock over the next three years.

The company’s shares rose 1.6 percent that day.

Last month, the board of the Washington Post authorized executives to buy back as many as 750,000 of the company’s Class B shares. Its stock rose 4.3 percent on the day of the announcement.

HP, for one, said it was carrying out buybacks to maintain the number of shares outstanding after employees cash in their stock options.

But critics say buybacks are a shortsighted way for companies to offload cash when they would be better off investing for the future.

“It’s totally wasted money,” said William Lazonick, a professor at the University of Massachusetts at Lowell and director of its Center for Industrial Competitiveness. “It does not do anything long-term for companies.”

Lazonick said executives liked buybacks because they boosted their own stock options.

Defenders of the practice say companies are better off buying back shares if they do not see opportunities to spend while demand remains weak.

“There are times when the best thing to do might well be to buy back your stock and issue it back again at higher prices,” said Jim Paulsen, chief investment strategist at Wells Capital Management. “There’s nothing wrong with that.”

Buybacks have become more popular in recent months as companies look for ways to spend the massive cash piles.

Nonfinancial companies held $1.8 trillion in cash and short-term assets at the end of the second quarter, according to the Federal Reserve. That is just slightly lower than in the first quarter, when corporate America set a record for cash holdings.

A third-quarter survey of nearly 1,000 chief financial officers by Duke University and CFO Magazine found that the executives’ optimism about the US economy had dropped 15 percent compared with the previous three months.

That is nearly as low as results from the first quarter of 2009, when the economic turmoil was in full swing.

Half of the CFOs said their companies would keep clinging to their cash, and only 0.7 percent said they expected to hire more full-time employees.


Washington Post