Film Review: 'The Thing' Prequel Lacks Original's Punch
Marcel Thee | February 01, 2012
‘The Thing’ scared audiences in 1982, but a new prequel lacks the original’s suspense. (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures) Related articles
'Dark Shadows' is a Shadow of Itself 4:36pm May 19, 2012
Sincere but Not Sentimental, ‘50/50’ Is Almost There 2:44pm May 14, 2012
A Walk in the Woods Takes A Dark Turn 11:49am May 3, 2012
‘21 Jump Street’ Remake is Funny and it Knows it 8:46pm Apr 25, 2012
Indonesian Thriller 'Modus Anomali' Is Not Your Ordinary Holiday Movie 6:55pm Apr 22, 2012
Post a comment
Please login to post comment
Comments
Be the first to write your opinion!
John Carpenter’s “The Thing,” originally released in 1982, was a horror-induced thriller with psychological dread and paranoia that gave it an edge over countless other gross-fests of the time. Sure it had an icky-looking alien antagonist at the center of the story, but the film’s strength was in how it captured the increasing terror in its human characters’ eyes.
Now we have a new “The Thing,” a prequel to the horror classic that lays out what happened prior to the events in the 1982 version. It has all of the required elements that made the original a pleasant, if coarse, surprise. Isolation caused by a blizzard and lots of abominable creatures, creating a similar sense of escalating trepidation for both the film’s characters and the viewer.
But that’s where the similarities end. If there is anything keeping this prequel from reflecting the same dread of its source material, it is an inferior cultivation of the driving sense of paranoia among the characters. And without that same grip on the human psyche — however horror cliche-like it might have been — the modern “Thing” is just another agreeable creature feature with a gimmick.
That’s not to say it is at all a dull experience. The lead character, a paleontologist played by Mary Elizabeth Winstead, avoids the usual horror-protagonist formula that often kills the momentum and unpredictability of similar scary flicks. Instead, she is level-headed and commanding, without sudden shifts in character. In other words, she’s about as believable as a protagonist can be.
The film begins with a group of scientists, the same ones who came to a bloody end at the start of the 1982 version, discover a wondrous-looking alien spacecraft and its inhabitant. They bring it back to their base and before long it breaks free and starts wrecking havoc.
Much of this will please fans of the original, as it finally explains many questions the original left open. We see how the alien escaped from his ice-block cell, which was found empty in the 1982 version, for instance.
But the story misses the mark in the second half, barely raising any alarm that the alien, a shape-shifting creature that is able to entirely replicate any human being and animal, could be any one of them. Instead, we see the characters scoff at the possibility of such a life form, only believing when it’s far too late. There is only one scene in which the tension of trying to figure out the imposter among them is shown, and it isn’t very tense.
The problem the prequel has is that it mistakes randomness for dread. The most threatening asset of the alien (or aliens; it’s never made clear) might be its ability to mimic anyone, but the process is left unexplored. As such, there’s no driving sense of suspicion among the characters, with the exception of Winstead’s paleontologist. The closest we get to a mind game is a pool of blood found in the shower that is suddenly cleaned up, presumably by the imposter, and one of the characters seeing someone leaving that bathroom.
This missing ingredient takes away from the primal suspense, rendering everything a gory version of a blindfold guessing game. It’s a gruesome “And Then There Were None,” with Eli Roth, instead of Agatha Christie, at the helm.
Taking away from the suspense is the frequent appearance of the alien itself. The original’s threatening ambience is replaced by vulgar displays of carnage that scream “gross out” rather than “dread.”
Still, the film works as an alien-slasher, with the Thing playing the role of a ruthless, flesh-eating hunter. If simplified as such, the film does offer a few terrors, though they are not atypical of the genre.
By choosing to play the part of a prequel, the film automatically suffers from comparison. The choice to focus on what was only hinted at in the first film is an inviting shtick, but the result makes you wish the filmmakers had instead done a remake more faithful to the original. At least then we could have actually experienced that infectious paranoia again.
The Thing
Directed by Matthijs van Heijningen Jr.
Starring Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Joel Edgerton, Ulrich Thomsen
103 minutes
English with Indonesian subtitles
- Indonesia ‘Most Tolerant Country in the World’: Religious Minister
- Indonesian Maid Spiked Boss' Coffee With Her Menstrual Blood
- Indonesia Wilts as Deforestation Moratorium Loopholes Go Unaddressed
- More Muslim Groups Demand Cancellation of Lady Gaga’s Jakarta Show
- Tomy Winata to Build Jakarta's Tallest Building
- Lady Gaga Refuses to Tone Down Her Shows: Manager
- Australia’s Corby Could Walk Free as Soon as Next Year
- Update: Australia, Indonesia Deny Corby Deal
- Singapore Cabby Jailed for Molesting Indonesian Maid
- President's Son Nearly Attacked by Angry Mob
-
9:29pm | Nearly Every High School Stude...
I can already imagine how many future Nobel prize laureate will be coming from the ranks of these students. And of course how many Nobel Prize winn -
9:28pm | Lady Gaga Refuses to Tone Down...
Ladygaga is my new heroine, she has more balls than our President and so-called majority peace-loving moderate but silent Muslims.. Now bataks shou -
9:24pm | Update: Australia, Indonesia D...
blightyboy, The cases emerged my friend was pointing out were in their late thirties up to late forties. Most of the cases go indetected according -
9:06pm | Most Still Unaware of Indonesi...
tell that to the journalist that just got stabbed by the government minister. The US needs to hurry up and sell these apes some artillery so they c -
9:02pm | Indonesia ‘Most Tolerant Count...
Jubal.Harshaw: post of the day sir. -
8:47pm | Most Still Unaware of Indonesi...
Good one, i believe it's the first country in the region(S.E.Asia) doing so, beside Australia and kiwi. -
8:36pm | Some Experts Say Indonesia's B...
@JohnnyFool I strongly believe everyone is entitled to speak freely on any topic . Those thugs have so many different fundamental b -
8:29pm | Indonesia ‘Most Tolerant Count...
22 - read the artice - most the people they reffering to are Indonesians NOT overseas. Its ok anyway because Indons have the highes
