Welcome Guest   |  Login   |   Signup
JG Logo
Sat, May 26, 2012
Archive Search

Indonesian Government Urges Crackdown on Violent Groups
Markus Junianto Sihaloho | August 31, 2010

The government called for a crackdown on any organization that disturbs public order or promotes anarchy and violence on Monday, in response to a rising tide of violent mob crimes. (AFP Photo/Adek Berry) The government called for a crackdown on any organization that disturbs public order or promotes anarchy and violence on Monday, in response to a rising tide of violent mob crimes. (AFP Photo/Adek Berry)
Share This Page
49
16
0
7
Share with google+ :


Post a comment
Please login to post comment

Comments

sirlance
12:25pm Sep 1, 2010

How about Bendera. They are extrimist that hold both malaysia and indonesia relationship ransom. threthen to kill innocent people.. Disband them and put them behid bars..

please dont do NATO yet again...


SirAnthonyKnown-Bender
9:51am Aug 31, 2010

I see the guy in the photo has his face almost totally covered...must be exploring his feminine side.


mauriceg
9:31am Aug 31, 2010

What does it take to wake the idiots in power from their slumber? They are talking as if events have yet to happen, as if they have foreseen what, unfortunately has already transpired.

It is also doubtful if:

a) they understand what has happened

b) they give a damn about the rights of Christian and other minorities whose rights have already been trampled

c) will actually put in place legislation to protect these minorities under the law

d) even if c) were enacted, FPI and other groups would simply ignore the law and do as they please

There is no strong message being sent out. It could well be too late to contain those groups. The police and others have been bribed, and /or are in thrall to politicians and groups with dangerous anti-pancasila tendencies; in other words, no-one (except radical Muslims) can expect the impartial, disinterested treatment that the Constitution was supposed to enshrine.

The Muslim nutters groups have to understand that they are part of the problem and not the solution, and of course, they won't ever see it that way.

By the way, one wonders about the religions recognised by the government. Why those? Why not others? I'm not advocating loony UFO believers groups (although a bit daft, probably less dangerous than the downright evil mask-wearing thugs).

In civilised countries freedom of belief and freedom of religion are near synonymous. That idea seems forever beyond the feeble mind-set in Indonesia today. As long as Muslim-inspired politicians are involved in human rights, or Constitutional matters, no other religious groups can expect fairness.


padt
7:17am Aug 31, 2010

The Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs - Djoko Suyanto glibly states - 'We need to tell them (violent organizations) that all organizations must respect Indonesian laws.'

While he's about it, why doesn't he say the same thing to his fellow lawmakers, politicians, government officials, police and army personel? They too so often show no 'respect' for Indonesian law. Just read the tally of daily corruption charges and abuse of authority.

The reason these thugs are flexing their muscles, taking the law into their own hands and intimidating society with both threats and actions is because they see that those who have authority abusing it also out of self interest.

I note too, the usual wishy washy 'respectful' language - people should 'respect' the law. How about - people must obey the law?

I am more and more convinced because the government is distracted with its own self serving agendas that in fact many in positions of power(-lessness) are afraid of the FPI.

They are pip squeaks - ignorant rabble with pretentious ideas of self importance and and inflated view of their own importance.

That's strange - am I describing the FPI or the lawmakers, politicians, government officials, police and army personel?


padt
7:02am Aug 31, 2010

The problem with the decree requiring residents' approval before a house of worship can be built is that - as everyone knows - it its application favours the muslim majority. Everyone knows that. When a christian group want to build a new church - the paperwork alone can be shuffled for years and obstacles suddenly become apparent.

Only when the government rules by the letter of the law and is seen to do so, so that radical muslims know that they are not living in a theocracy and that they are not above the law and cannot take the law into their own hands, will there be any real development in religious harmony.

meanwhile, because of the lack of will of the government and law enforcers, and the cynical manipulation of religious tensions by politicians, a vacuum is growing and the muslim hardliners are filling it.

And the4y will one day turn, not only on non muslims, but on their present allies - those who are at present abetting them - politicians andpolice who will not stand up to them.

The short term vison of some Indonesians is tragic because it will lead to massive social, economic, political and religious upheaval. But those money grasping, power crazy dopes don't care while they can get what they want.

One day they will find themselves getting something from the likes of the FPI they didn't expect.


Jakarta. Government leaders agreed on Monday to push for law enforcement to act firmly against any organization that disturbs public order or promotes anarchy and violence.

“We are pushing the state apparatus to strictly execute the laws dealing with violations and anarchism by certain mass organizations,” Priyo Budi Santoso, the deputy house speaker and a Golkar Party member, said following a meeting with several ministers and top officials dealing with political, legal and security affairs.

Present at the meeting were Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs Djoko Suyanto, Religious Affairs Minister Suryadharma Ali, Home Affairs Minister Gamawan Fauzi, State Intelligence Agency Chief Sutanto and National Police Chief Gen. Bambang Hendarso Danuri.

The attendants, who gathered in the wake of recent violent attacks on religious minorities by Islamic hard-liners, agreed that the state will never accept any violence carried out in the name of ethnicity, race or religion, Priyo said.

They also called for strong measures against organizations that could threaten the country’s sovereignty, such as separatist groups.

Golkar lawmaker Nudirman Munir said that the government needed to take tougher action against civil society groups in Papua which have been calling for a self-determination referendum there.

“If we let them do that, they will become bigger,” he cautioned.

The meeting also called on the House of Representatives to immediately launch a revision of a 1995 law on mass organizations, Priyo said.

“What we discussed during the meeting should become the basis of the revision,” Priyo said.

Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) lawmaker Said Abdullah said the police should arrest members of any organization using violence in the name of religion, stressing that such behavior amounted to terrorism.

He also criticized the police for appearing too passive in dealing with such groups. Bambang, though, said the police simply did not have enough personnel to deal with all violations.

“But we are still serious about law enforcement. We have even sent the leader of that certain group to prison,” he said, alluding to radical cleric Abu Bakar Bashir, who was arrested in mid-August on terrorism charges relating to his connections with a paramilitary training camp in Aceh.

Djoko said he believed that most mass organizations were resistant to any government “guidance,” but vowed to enhance programs to strengthen dialog between the government and prominent organizations.

“We do need to tell them that all organizations must respect Indonesian laws,” Djoko said.

Meanwhile, the PDI-P urged the government to revoke a joint decree requiring approval from local residents before a house of worship is constructed.

“Why should we have a regulation that requires permission from local residents if any religion wants to build a new house of worship?” Said questioned, agreeing with charges that the regulation has produced only conflict.

However, Suryadharma said the decree was approved by senior representatives from the six major religions recognized by the government.

“If we freed any religion to build their houses of worship, would it prevent us from further conflict? I don’t think so. The decree is useful in preventing conflict among religion communities,” Suryadharma said.