Welcome Guest   |  Login   |   Signup
JG Logo
Thu, February 9, 2012
Archive Search

Law Will Make Disabled Wear Signs in Traffic
Farouk Arnaz & Febriamy Hutapea | May 27, 2009

A traffic law update containing a clause calling for disabled pedestrians to wear special signs has been met with anger from activists. (Photo: Safir Makki, JG) A traffic law update containing a clause calling for disabled pedestrians to wear special signs has been met with anger from activists. (Photo: Safir Makki, JG)
Share This Page
4
0
0
5
Share with google+ :


Post a comment
Please login to post comment

Comments

snywlnngwks
7:42pm May 27, 2009

Don't the disabled already face enough stigma from society? And now the government wants them to advertise their disability?

Instead of requiring the disabled to wear "I am disabled" signs, the government should focus on building disabled-friendly pedestrian facilities. This government has obviously got its priorities all mixed up.


TheMan
5:09pm May 27, 2009

Better yet, why not make the disabled wear those electronic billboards that the City Council is pushing?

I can see it now: "Don't drive into me 'coz LA Lights will sue for defacement of property."

cassie aun
4:39pm May 27, 2009

I don't know how we can expect clarity from a transportation minister who declares “there has been a change in the paradigm that influences the transportation sector." If he knows what that means, I'm impressed.

Golkar Party representative also suggests the handicapped sign move is 'for their own protection'. Have some suggestions for what that party could do for its own protection, but that's an entirely different matter...

Simon P
3:49pm May 27, 2009

Yes I think Pinko has spotted the flaw in the "Don't drive into me 'coz I'm disabled" line of reasoning here. Driving into the able bodied is presumably to be encouraged. Personally I'll be wearing a "Don't drive into me 'coz I don't want to be disabled" sign.

Pinko
1:06pm May 27, 2009

This is terrible! So discriminatory. Makes me think of the Nazis, labeling people. Horrible! Who thought this up!

How is a sign is going to make a difference in the traffic here anyway. People will be too busy driving like maniacs to notice a little sign. Plus, shouldn't cars and motorcycles try not to hit ALL pedestrians, whether they are differently abled or not? One can only hope this is the case. If the sign can do anything other than discriminate and actually has some sort of safety value, I'm going to just start wearing one that says "please don't hit me with your overburdened motorcycle". I didn't realize it was so easy to increase traffic safety! I always thought safe footpaths might be the first step, but of course, I am obviously wrong.

  • Previous
  • 1
  • Next

Lawmakers on Tuesday unanimously voted to update a 1992 Traffic Law, but ran into immediate controversy over a clause in the new version that requires disabled pedestrians to wear signs to warn others of their condition.

“All [political] factions agreed without any objection,” said Muhaimin Iskandar, deputy speaker of the House of Representatives, who led the plenary session.

Transportation Minister Jusman Sjafii Djamal, who was also present, said the new Traffic and Road Transportation Law was needed as the 1992 version was no longer adequate.

“There has been a change in the paradigm that influences the transportation sector,” Jusman said, adding that there was a need for a clearer definition of the responsibilities of those involved in road traffic.

The new law contains 326 articles, but it was the second clause of Article 80 that was met with anger from activists who protested its requirement for disabled pedestrians to wear warning signs.

“Handicapped pedestrians are obliged to wear special signs that can be easily recognized by other road users,” the clause stated. It also said that further details would be determined by a regulation.

“This law is to protect pedestrians, including those who are handicapped,” Malkan Amin of the Golkar Party said. “It is for their own protection.”

But to many activists, the clause smacks of discrimination.

“I am very disappointed. This is an infringement on human rights and will particularly affect the handicapped because they have to wear signs while on the streets,” said Saharuddin Daming, a blind member of the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM). “This is marginalizing the handicapped.”

He said the law should aim to make public spaces more accessible for people with disabilities.

Saharuddin cited Bandung, West Java, where local authorities provided special traffic lights near an institute for the visually impaired, allowing its members to change the lights to red to ensure a safe crossing.

“That is what should have been regulated, things like traffic signs signaling the presence of blind people, so that people drive more carefully,” he said.

Darmaningtyas, chairman of the Institute of Transportation Studies, was quoted by Agence France-Presse as saying that the law was preposterous and that the government should focus on providing facilities such as level footpaths and wheelchair ramps.

“It is strange when handicapped people are asked to carry extra burdens,” Darmaningtyas said.

The law will come into effect when signed by the president or after three months have passed.