Prita Reports Supreme Court Judges to Judicial Commission
Dessy Sagita | August 15, 2011
Prita Mulyasari, following a hearing with Commission III General at Parliament Complex, Senayan, Jakarta, Tuesday, July 12, 2011. (JG Photo/ Yudhi Sukma Wijaya) Related articles
Thai Lese Majeste Convict ‘Died of Liver Cancer’ 8:27pm May 9, 2012
Australian Sues Twitter Over Hate Blog: Report 11:27am Feb 17, 2012
Indonesian Doctor Facing Defamation for Telling Friends of Sexual Harassment 11:06pm Jan 26, 2012
Angolan Journalist Jailed for Libel 3:57pm Oct 11, 2011
Council to Weigh in on Bali Governor’s Complaint 9:30pm Sep 28, 2011
Post a comment
Please login to post comment
Comments
459401Gutsy lady. I wish her luck against these bleeding crooks.
- Previous
- 1
- Next
A Tangerang mother of three handed a suspended six-month jail term for a controversial criminal libel conviction, has accused judges of violating the code of ethics. Prita Mulyasari, 34, who was found guilty and sentenced by the Supreme Court has reported the judges who handled her case to the Judicial Commission.
Slamet Yuwono, Prita’s attorney, said they hoped the Commission would question the judges and ask them to clarify the ruling that threatens Prita with jail should she reoffend.
The judges in question were M. Zaharuddin Utama, Salman Luthan and R. Imam Harjadi Slamet, who found the Supreme Court’s latest ruling was in contradiction to its acquittal of Prita’s civil libel case. He said its ruling of the civil case clearly stated she had not defamed Omni by her emails. Yet in stark contrast its ruling in the criminal case stated otherwise.
“As a respectable institution that many people perceive to be the last legal resort, the Supreme Court should not make this kind of conflicting ruling,” Slamet said. He added there were too many “oddities” in the case that indicated the judges had not been fair.
He said Prita wanted the judges to be questioned and if found guilty of violating the code of ethics should be sanctioned. However in a statement about the appeal the Supreme Court stated, “Prita’s case is a high profile one that has been under the spotlight for some time, and the judges are still able to make voice their opposition.”
A spokesman for the Judicial Commission, Asep Rahmat Fajar, said Prita’s report was to be discussed by a panel before any action was taken.
"The panel will verify the report and decide whether or not the report should be processed," he said. He said it was too early to see if the accused judges have actually committed an ethical code violation. Prita’s roller-coaster legal battle first started in mid-2008 when the Tangerang Omni International Hospital accused her of libel after she sent e-mails criticizing the hospital’s service provision to 20 of her friends.
Though the emails were meant to be private, Omni sued Prita in a civil case at the Tangerang District Court and won Rp 312 million ($37 thousand).
Prita appealed to the Banten High Court, which reduced the damages to $204 million before appealing to the Supreme Court, which quashed the conviction all together. In early 2009, she was also tried in a criminal libel case and detained by the prosecutors for three weeks. Prita was released after much public outcry and the support of many prominent figures including former President Megawati Sukarnoputri who visited her in jail.
The Tangerang District Court threw out the prosecutors’ preliminary arguments and acquitted her of the criminal libel. However prosecutors challenged the preliminary ruling and the High Court ordered a re-trial in which Prita was also acquitted. Once again Prosecutors appealed the ruling and the Supreme Court upheld the appeal last month.
- Tomy Winata to Build Jakarta's Tallest Building
- Lady Gaga Angers Thai Fans With Fake Rolex Comment
- Lady Gaga Refuses to Tone Down Her Shows: Manager
- Indonesia Set to Cap Bank Owners’ Stakes: Sources
- President's Son Nearly Attacked by Angry Mob
- Singapore Cabby Jailed for Molesting Indonesian Maid
- If You Don’t Like It, Don’t Watch, Djoko Says of Gaga
- Indonesia's Chief Justice Demands SBY Explain Corby Clemency
- Djoko Says ‘I Don’t Care’ About FPI Demonstration
- National Exams' ‘Fantastic’ Passing Rate Suspicious: ICW
-
10:41pm | Djoko Says ‘I Don’t Care’ Abou...
Meanwhile, in complete contrast from what the S.O.B is at liberty to say under the freedom of his beloved Indonesian constitution.... -
10:34pm | Tomy Winata to Build Jakarta's...
As sound as interesting it is, and how people would picture this monumental skyscraper will glorify the skyline of Jakarta. I see no objectives. -
10:34pm | Indonesian Police Consider Ton...
A small but extremely loud group of mentally retarded inbreds. And you know what we do with retarded inbreds: we ignore them. -
10:30pm | If You Don’t Like It, Don’t Wa...
The picture showed People with deepest and darkest hatred for other human beings and showing their true color by calling them KAFIR? You can only s -
10:04pm | Djoko Says ‘I Don’t Care’ Abou...
more on Sobri (lets call him S.O.B. from now on) Jakarta Post 15/4/08 – A videotape screened on Monday showed Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) -
9:42pm | Lady Gaga Concert Promoter Has...
the whole country went gaga over lady gaga -
9:41pm | Two IPB Security Guards Shot D...
Ah Bogor - such a center of peace and piety. -
9:39pm | Lady Gaga Concert Promoter Has...
"a permit from the venue, a recommendation from the Jakarta police, a recommendation from the Tourism and Creative Economy Ministry, a permit for
