Welcome Guest   |  Login   |   Signup
JG Logo
Tue, May 22, 2012
Archive Search

The Thinker: China’s Tough Talk
Keith Loveard | August 26, 2009

Related articles

The Thinker: May 1998 Revisited 4:46pm May 16, 2012

The Thinker: Saving Our Movies 10:28am May 15, 2012

The Thinker: The Gun With the Bad 9:16am May 8, 2012

The Thinker: Divisive Language 12:50pm May 1, 2012

The Thinker: The Bandung Spirit 9:29am Apr 24, 2012

Share This Page
0
0
0
3
Share with google+ :


Post a comment
Please login to post comment

Comments

Erland
5:59am Aug 26, 2009

First, I think we need to be careful calling Ms. Kadeer the "spiritual leader" of the Uyghur people. She is certainly a leader, but she is not a Sheikh or a buwi, and her quest is not one of religion, it is one of human rights.

Secondly, @Akura, there are no benefits for the Chinese for treating the Uyghur people fairly. Xinjiang is sitting on a goldmine of natural resources, and the Uyghurs only present a hurdle... the same as the Tibetans and the Mongols.

The rest of the world should advocate for the human rights of all people, and in doing so, they would by default have to back the Uyghur people in negotiating with Beijing. The complex situation the Uyghurs find themselves in is frustrating, and it is up to the international community to help guide China to peacefully resolving the tension and problems in Xinjiang.

-Erland

http://uyghurblog.com


Nathan.W
4:02am Aug 26, 2009

This is a Very well written article; thank you for the insights Keith. Every time I purchase $4 – Five cuts wild Salmon (made in China) from Walmart, I always wonder where the fish actually came from. Indonesian government must consider invisible costs of trade with China, starts with illegal logging and fishing, the monetary value could be significant enough to patch a whole in government’s budget deficit.

There is one fundamental flaw in China’s economic development; Spending done by the Communist Central government has been excessive, and the ROI is questionable. Economic data published is undoubtedly polished; I am more concern about their actual public bad debts, with general estimate around 40% of GDP. This hidden problem continues to grow especially with China’s massive economic stimulus program. This could eventually resurface and potentially marginalize China’s power in the short run, giving room for South East Asia to take advantage of the situation and play catch up.


Akura
1:09am Aug 26, 2009

While it is clear that China is willing to compromise with foreign nations for long-term benefit, it is not clear how China will deal with the Uyghur and other independent ethnic groups in the country. What benefit do the Han Chinese, who seem to be the de-facto representatives of the Chinese get from the Uighur population? For a country that is clearly motivated by a carrot and stick approach I fail to see what tangible benefits they can offer the Han-dominated government. If the Chinese only respect those that they can gain from - then it is clear there is little respect for the Uighur people. The clips from the China Daily in this video make it clear that China does not have the human rights of the Uyghur as a main priority - so should the rest of the world advocate for the Uyghur in their dealings with Beijing?

http://www.newsy.com/videos/china_puts_rioters_on_trial


  • Previous
  • 1
  • Next

Australia last week played up a $34.6 billion liquefied natural gas deal with China, with Prime Minister Kevin Rudd stating the bilateral relationship had survived a number of problems, not least the arrest for espionage of four employees of mining giant Rio Tinto.

The PetroChina deal, from Beijing’s side of the divide, is likely to be an entirely different issue compared with the alleged espionage issue and another irritant, Canberra’s agreement to allow a visit by Uighur native and separatist figure Rebiya Kadeer.

In a similar use of China’s clout, Indonesia was recently forced to send home the large majority of 75 Chinese fishermen arrested in what Indonesia considers its exclusive economic zone to the north of the Natuna islands.

While the cases are different, the tactics of the Chinese government are similar: apply pressure over an incident that has the potential to provide long-term advantage, then release that pressure while retaining the moral high ground.

In the fishing incident, Beijing initially demanded the return of all of the fishermen, then relented and allowed Indonesia to keep the captains of the eight boats on charges of illegal fishing. No reports of any pursuit of that case by the authorities have been published, perhaps indicating that it has been quietly dropped rather than upset China.

In pressing its hand, China stated that the fishermen were operating in the waters of the Nangsha islands, its name for the Spratly group, and has effectively reinstated its claim to the southernmost islands in the group and left the way open for a further claim should there prove to be oil and gas reserves in the area.

In the Rio Tinto case, while the four employees — including Australian Stern Hu — were initially held on charges of stealing state secrets, China then downgraded the charges to business bribery. China might also argue privately that Rio Tinto slighted it in rejecting a proposed A$19.5 billion ($16.3 billion) investment in the company by China’s state-owned metals giant Chinalco, in what must have appeared to Beijing as an unfriendly act.

In both the Rio Tinto and fisheries cases, the critical factor for all the nations in the region is China’s tactics: it starts out talking tough, then compromises while maintaining the upper hand, leaving itself in a strong position for further assaults.

The case of Rebiya Kadeer is arguably different. The woman considered the spiritual leader of the Uighur Muslim minority in China’s far west is in the same category as the Dalai Lama: a thorn in the shoe, but not one that will stop the country’s forward movement toward regional and then international dominance.

China will not go all out to use its political might to force its neighbors into submission, at least not at this stage. As Wang Yong of Peking University was reported as stating when the LNG deal was signed, China will deal with disputes with Australia in a “cooperative way” because it relies on economic cooperation.

Just as it needs Australian raw materials, it needs Indonesia for energy supplies and as a market for its goods. Indonesia risks being drawn into a Chinese zone of influence through a steady flow of credit — such as funding for power plants — and through trade dominance.

In the wider region, China cannot for the time being hope to challenge the United States as a global power, especially given the vast superiority of American naval power. Despite its size and its enormous economic potential, China remains a developing nation in comparison to the vast technological lead of the United States.

However, with cracks appearing in US dominance, not least the morass it has got itself into in Iraq and Afghanistan plus the enormity of the debt it has amassed as a result of the financial meltdown, China can begin to see opportunity in the long term.

Translating long-term potential into reality will need great care and finesse on the part of Beijing, but if there is one thing that China possesses, it is patience.

That important commodity, plus a cool strategic mind as displayed in its recent gambits involving Australia and Indonesia, can be expected to be the touchstone of its strategies over the next few decades.

For Indonesia, the challenge will be to effectively play one of its many suitors off against the others and maintain a real degree of independence. As the fishing incursion showed, it will also need to be on guard for stealthy Chinese attempts to erode both its sovereignty and, in the longer term, its ability to act independently in both political and economic spheres.

Keith Loveard is a Jakarta-based security consultant and journalist.